Work in Progress

Child Penalty Estimation and Mothers' Age at First Birth

with Valentina Melentyeva*

Discussion Paper

Abstract We show that the widespread approach to estimate the career costs of motherhood – so-called “child penalties” – is prone to produce biased results, as it pools first-time mothers of all ages without accounting for their differences in characteristics and outcomes. We propose a novel method building on the recent advances in the difference-in-differences literature to address this issue. Applied to German administrative data, our method yields 30 percent larger post-birth earnings losses than the conventional approach. We document meaningful effect heterogeneity by maternal age in both magnitude and interpretation, highlighting its key role in understanding the impact of motherhood.

Wage Inequality Consequences of Expanding Public Childcare

Discussion Paper

Abstract Family policies are important in shaping the labor supply of women. Hence, for the female part of the population, they play a role as labor market institutions. While the impact of such institutions as unions or minimum wages on wage inequality has extensively been studied, family policies and their effect on inequality have received much less attention. This paper, therefore, assesses the impact of a large expansion of public childcare in Germany on wage inequality. Exploiting regional variation in childcare supply, I show that in regions with stronger increases in childcare wage inequality among women increased less strongly compared to regions with smaller increases. This is primarily driven by the lower half of the wage distribution and qualitatively similar for both full- and part-time workers. Larger expansions in childcare, however, do not contribute to a further closing of the gender wage gap, suggesting they are associated with a more negative selection of women into the workforce.

Unpacking Parental Leave: The Role of Job Protection

with Sebastian Findeisen*, Jörg Heining* and Sebastian Siegloch*

Contact me for slides

Abstract Parental leave is one of the most important policies that shape the post-birth careers of women. We exploit a sequence of parental leave reforms in Germany that extended both the job protection period and the duration of parental leave benefits to different extents to study the effects of the two policy instruments parental leave consists of. Using administrative social security data, we first replicate the stylized facts that mothers respond to extensions in parental leave and that the average effect of longer leave-taking on their careers is negative. In a second step, we analyze the causal effects of job protection and parental benefit payments. Holding constant the length of mothers' post-birth labor market break, we show that extending job protection significantly reduces losses in long-run earnings while extensions of the benefit duration have no measurable impact. The positive effect of employment protection works both by enhancing employer continuity as well as by improving outside opportunities for mothers who change their employer.

Published

Government Consumption in the DINA Framework: Allocation Methods and Consequences

with Holger Stichnoth*, International Tax and Public Finance, 2024, 31(3), 736–779.

Paper Journal Website

Abstract About half of government expenditure in the United States takes the form of government consumption (e.g., education, defense, infrastructure). In many studies of post-tax inequality based on the DINA framework (including the influential study by Piketty, Saez, and Zucman 2018), government consumption is allocated either proportionally to post-tax disposable income or on a per-capita basis, and the level of inequality is fairly sensitive to this choice. This paper provides direct evidence on how public education spending (a substantial part of government consumption) is actually distributed. An allocation proportional to post-tax disposable income is clearly rejected, while a lump-sum allocation is found to provide a good approximation.